• Deliver an inconspicuous retransmission device integrated into a sleeve/case that satisfies CSfC MACP v2.7 hardwired connection requirements (no external cables).
• Use NIAP-validated components from the CSfC Components List; government will not accept achieving NIAP validation during the prototype.
• ITAR-regulated domestic manufacturing and assembly; comply with the Trade Agreements Act; implement supply chain risk management.
• Section 889(a)(1)(A)&(B) compliance for modem chips; connectivity silicon must be physically distinct from the main processor.
• Connectivity: request for unlocked 4G/LTE (eSIM + physical SIM), CONUS/OCONUS capable, and Wi‑Fi 6E/7 support; prototype must demonstrate Wi‑Fi connectivity at minimum (noted ambiguity).
• Optional outer VPN on the RD, if provided, must use an independent cryptographic keystore and support CNSA Suite 2.0 IPsec profile per draft PQ guidance.
• Centralized cloud administration platform at FedRAMP High and/or DISA Impact Level 6; support OTA firmware updates, remote monitoring, automated inventory/asset tracking, and full lifecycle support including secure disposal.
• Prototype performance target ≤6 months; anticipated budget $500K–$850K to deliver ~20 devices.
• CMMC Level 2 (self) required pre-award and recorded in SPRS with continuous compliance; CMMC Level 3 (C3PAO) required for follow-on production.
• Submission: Solution Brief due 20 April 2026, 11:00 a.m. CDT to the DITCO OTA inbox; ABSC form completion for prime and significant participants.

• Unconfirmed internal CMMC Level 2 status required pre-award (must be in SPRS).
• Need for ITAR domestic manufacturing and assembly; Trace may require a qualified U.S.-based manufacturing partner.
• Requirement to use NIAP-validated components at prototype start may constrain sourcing/options and schedule.
• Ambiguity between cellular vs Wi‑Fi for prototype demonstration could create scope misalignment unless clarified.
• Aggressive 6‑month schedule for hardware design/integration, testing, and delivery of ~20 units.
• Admin platform at FedRAMP High/IL6 may require partner tooling or accreditation alignment.
• Section 889 and chip separation constraints may limit modem/vendor options and increase lead times.

• U.S.-based ITAR-compliant device/case manufacturer with experience integrating NIAP-listed components.
• Supplier(s) of NIAP-validated components aligned to CSfC MACP v2.7 and CSfC Components List.
• FedRAMP High / DoD IL6-capable device management platform partner for admin, OTA updates, monitoring, and asset tracking.
• CMMC advisory/assessment support to ensure Level 2 (self) pre-award readiness (and Level 3 path for follow-on).
• Wireless hardware expertise for modem/Wi‑Fi integration meeting Section 889 and chip separation requirements.
• Test/validation partner for CSfC conformance, NIAP component verification, and DISA acceptance.

• NSA Trusted Integrator with long-standing CSfC deployments reduces CSfC/NIAP integration risk and accelerates compliance.
• DISA past performance (e.g., MPE-S prime; GSM-O sub) and mission familiarity enable faster stakeholder alignment and delivery.
• E&I Facility for rapid integration, T&E to military standards, and production/deployment supports accelerated 6‑month prototype.
• OCC/managed services experience positions Trace to deliver IL6/FedRAMP High-aligned lifecycle management and monitoring.
• Proven tactical comms and multi-domain integration background strengthens solution credibility for secure mobile use cases.

• CMMC Level 2 (self) must be in SPRS pre-award; Trace’s current level is not confirmed in the company profile.
• ITAR domestic manufacturing is mandatory; internal manufacturing capability not documented—requires teaming.
• NIAP-validated components required at prototype start; limited vendor pool could impact cost/schedule.
• Deleted attachment noted on SAM; although a current AOI PDF is available, ensure version control before submission.
• Prototype scope ambiguity on cellular vs Wi‑Fi demonstration; requires Q&A clarification.

No human notes yet.